A | DENVER -- Colorado’s highest court on Monday upheld the search of Google users' keyword history to identify suspects in a 2020 fatal arson fire, an approach that critics have called a digital dragnet that threatens to undermine people's privacy and their constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. However the Colorado Supreme Court cautioned it was not making a “broad proclamation” on the constitutionality of such warrants and emphasized it was ruling on the facts of just this one case.At issue before the court was a search warrant from Denver police requiring Google to provide the IP addresses of anyone who had searched over 15 days for the address of the home that was set on fire, killing five immigrants from the West African nation of Senegal. After some back and forth over how Google would be able to provide information without violating its privacy policy, Google produced a spreadsheet of sixty-one searches made by eight accounts. Google provided the IP addresses for those accounts, but no names. Five of the IP addresses were based in Colorado and police obtained the names of those people through another search warrant. After investigating those people, police eventually identified three teens as suspects.One of them, Gavin Seymour, asked the court to throw the evidence out because it violated the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures by being overbroad and not being targeted against a specific person suspected of a crime. Search warrants to gather evidence are typically sought once police have identified a suspect and gathered some probable cause to believe they committed a crime. But in this case, the trail had run cold and police were seeking a “reverse keyword” warrant for the Google search history in a quest to identify possible suspects. Since the attack seemed targeted, investigators believed whoever set fire to the house would have searched for directions to it.The state Supreme Court ruled that Seymour had a constitutionally protected privacy interest in his Google search history even though it was just connected with an IP address and not his name. While it also said it assumes that the warrant was “constitutionally defective” for not specifying an “individualized probable cause”, the court said it would not throw out the evidence because police were acting in good faith under what was known about the law at the time. The court said it was not aware of any other state supreme court or federal appellate court that has dealt with this type of warrant before.“Our finding of good faith today neither condones nor condemns all such warrants in the future. If dystopian problems emerge, as some fear, the courts stand ready to hear argument regarding how we should rein in law enforcement’s use of rapidly advancing technology. Today, we proceed incrementally based on the facts before us," it said. In a dissent, Justice Monica Marquez said such a wide-ranging search of a billion Google users' search history without a particular target is exactly the kind the Fourth Amendment was designed to stop.“At the risk of sounding alarmist, I fear that by upholding this practice, the majority’s ruling today gives constitutional cover to law enforcement seeking unprecedented access to the private lives of individuals not just in Colorado, but across the globe. And I fear that today’s decision invites courts nationwide to do the same,” she said in the dissent, which Justice Carlos Samour joined in. In a statement, Google said it was important that the court's ruling recognized the privacy and First Amendment interests involved in keyword searches. “With all law enforcement demands, including reverse warrants, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” it said. The ruling allows the prosecution of Seymour and Kevin Bui, who were 16 at the time of the Aug. 5, 2020, fire, to move ahead in adult court on charges of first-degree murder, attempted murder, arson and burglary. Investigators allege Bui organized the attack on the home because he mistakenly believed people who had stolen his iPhone during a robbery lived there.Telephone messages and an email sent to Seymour's lawyers, Jenifer Stinson and Michael Juba, were not immediately returned. A lawyer for Bui, Christian Earle, could not be reached for comment. A third teen, Dillon Siebert, who was 14 at the time and originally charged as a juvenile, pleaded guilty earlier this year to second-degree murder in adult court under a deal that prosecutors and the defense said balanced his lesser role in planning the fire, his remorse and interest in rehabilitation with the horror of the crime. He was sentenced to 10 years behind bars.。
阿里云优惠券 先领券再下单 2025年618购物节已进入高潮期，如何抓住最佳购买时机、享受最大降价力度？本文将结合平台活动规则与实测数据，为你拆解手机降价规律与省钱技巧，助你精准“抄底”！2025年618的终极省钱时段锁定在6月17日20:00至6月18日24:00！ 这28小时是平台价格战的巅峰期，全网现货直降、叠加券、满减活动集中爆发，堪称年度购物性价比天花板。 首先，划重点！2025年最新的京东618红包口令是「红包到手798」，天猫/淘宝618红包口令是「红包到手90900」记得每天去领，领的红包大小和你搜索的什么口令有关的! 这两个口令，今年发放力度非常大，还有iphone16免单！ 京东APP搜：红包到手798（每天可领三次） 淘宝APP搜：红包到手90900 重点：先在app搜一下口令，以后每天点历史搜索记录就可以了
核心逻辑：平台在收官阶段释放最大库存和隐藏券，冲刺销售额目标，消费者可坐收渔利！ 终极优惠规则：三重叠加省钱公式 跨店满减全面升级 京东：全品类开启“每满299减50”，较日常折扣高20%，自动叠加国家补贴（搜索“家电599”或“数码599”再省500-2000元） 淘宝：“每满300减50”+官方立减15%，88VIP会员额外领“满5000减400”神券 会员特权放大收益 京东PLUS：领“满6000减600”专属券，付款返10倍京豆（1000京豆=10元现金） 淘宝88VIP：95折基础上，兑换“满5000减500”消费券，直播间加赠隐藏券（如满999减200） 爆款底价+库存加量 硬通货备货量比开门红增3倍！例如： iPhone 16直降1500元，到手5999元 戴森吹风机降至2299元（差价400元） 75寸电视跌破3800元 ⏰ 28小时黄金作战指南（分阶段拆解） ✅ 倒计时备战（6月17日19:50前） 加购目标品：提前勾选商品，开通免密支付，检查地址和余额 领券锁补贴： 京东搜“红包到手798”每日领3次红包（最高25888元），PLUS会员领“满6000减600”券 淘宝搜“红包到手90900”，88VIP兑换大额券 
⚡ 闪电抢购（20:00-20:10） 优先冲刺10秒售罄品：iPhone、茅台、戴森等用多个设备抢 会员通道特权：京东PLUS/淘宝88VIP提前5分钟下单
申请创业报道，分享创业好点子。
B | 点击此处，共同探讨创业新机遇！。
Current article:http://zcyuf.sunaichitikouchua.bond/8qs/4x8bo0s.html
Published on:19:43:32
